LuciousTimes

The Great Monarchy - Police Policies (Royal Guard)

Recommended Posts

As future governor I must say the police force is the most important aspect of the game. Due to the fact that crime in the city will be ridiculously high I'll need many brave players willing to risk their lives in order to protect the city's businesses, people, and daily lives in general. As governor I have the capability to write and enact laws. Including laws that enact wages for our officers. I believe officers or any form of police service should be awarded the highest game career pay. Support The Great Monarchy and don't be shy to give your input, I'd like to build a good conversation.

 

 

Edited by PrezLegend
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you want to start a King and Queen kinda thing, like the UK? I'm not sure how well that would work considering that the map is based off the USA and that means Democracy.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Cryogenix3 said:

So you want to start a King and Queen kinda thing, like the UK? I'm not sure how well that would work considering that the map is based off the USA and that means Democracy.

We would just continue relecting the same person! That way we could be sure all the laws remained the same and pay grades for officers stays the same!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Cryogenix3 said:

Oh I see

A few other players and I are building an alliance of businesses, military,  policers, and mobs! Do you have any of those groups? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/7/2017 at 7:32 PM, PrezLegend said:

We would just continue relecting the same person! That way we could be sure all the laws remained the same and pay grades for officers stays the same!

I doubt the politics career will work like that. And to be honest, I think that's a good thing. What if a governor became corrupted? We don't know if there will be a corruption prevention system for the politics career like there will be for the law enforcement career. We as players deserve the right to inspect every politician in the game and choose whether they have the right to lead us. You are starting to sound power hungry Prez.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mentality said:

I doubt the politics career will work like that. And to be honest, I think that's a good thing. What if a governor became corrupted? We don't know if there will be a corruption prevention system for the politics career like there will be for the law enforcement career. We as players deserve the right to inspect every politician in the game and choose whether they have the right to lead us. You are starting to sound power hungry Prez.

I wouldn't call myself power hungry! I just want the Island to have a good Governor and I feel I could be one. I'm a politician in real life and would like to live that life in Identity as well! You've spoken a lot about me and my ways! Staying curious asking questions and things! I appreciate it! Don't worry I won't be a dictator with crazy laws and things! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, PrezLegend said:

I wouldn't call myself power hungry! I just want the Island to have a good Governor and I feel I could be one. I'm a politician in real life and would like to live that life in Identity as well! You've spoken a lot about me and my ways! Staying curious asking questions and things! I appreciate it! Don't worry I won't be a dictator with crazy laws and things! 

Spoken like a true politician, talking like you will do more good than harm. A lot of bad politicians talked like that in the beginning. We don't know that for certain Prez.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mentality said:

Spoken like a true politician, talking like you will do more good than harm. A lot of bad politicians talked like that in the beginning. We don't know that for certain Prez.

You're right, you'll never know what someone is going to be like when they're in office! That's the chance you take when you elect someone! But I'm a good one for sure, search me on Google!  @PrezLegend on all social media! I'm just a young guy trying to make it big like everyone else and I see my place in politics!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, PrezLegend said:

You're right, you'll never know what someone is going to be like when they're in office! That's the chance you take when you elect someone! But I'm a good one for sure, search me on Google!  @PrezLegend on all social media! I'm just a young guy trying to make it big like everyone else and I see my place in politics!

Politicians like to make a good name for themselves on media in the beginning as well. But they reveal their true colors as soon as they are elected. Sorry, but I can't the word of whatever the social media says about you seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Mentality said:

Politicians like to make a good name for themselves on media in the beginning as well. But they reveal their true colors as soon as they are elected. Sorry, but I can't the word of whatever the social media says about you seriously.

Then it seems to me you wouldn't vote for anybody. If you can't take anything seriously! Why, would you want to talk politics if you won't believe any politicians?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To prove a point, scrutinize, and point out flaws. No other reason. Comes with witnessing too many bad ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mentality said:

To prove a point, scrutinize, and point out flaws. No other reason. Comes with witnessing too many bad ones.

And I understand that! No matter what I say I know I'm not gonna sway you, but the I can do is tell you to trust me. I don't know how old you are but I'm a young guy with dreams of being a great politician!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, PrezLegend said:

And I understand that! No matter what I say I know I'm not gonna sway you, but the I can do is tell you to trust me. I don't know how old you are but I'm a young guy with dreams of being a great politician!

 

33.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Mentality said:

33.

As I thought, I could tell you were older when you spoke of experience!  I'm 15, though I own many real life organizations and love politics...politics done right!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/7/2017 at 8:25 PM, Cryogenix3 said:

So you want to start a King and Queen kinda thing, like the UK? I'm not sure how well that would work considering that the map is based off the USA and that means Democracy.

Well the US isn't a democracy SOOOOOOO.....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, jman9798 said:

Well the US isn't a democracy SOOOOOOO.....

Do you live in the United States of America? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎7‎/‎2017 at 7:25 PM, Cryogenix3 said:

So you want to start a King and Queen kinda thing, like the UK? I'm not sure how well that would work considering that the map is based off the USA and that means Democracy.

The United States is a democratic republic, not a democracy.

 

Edited by Mentality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Mentality said:

The United States is a republic, not a democracy. Democrats may often be in office, but at it's core the U.S. is a republic.

 

Ah, well it's actually a Democratic Republic! Due the fact that citizens vote and we have elected represenitives! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2017 at 10:19 PM, PrezLegend said:

Ah, well it's actually a Democratic Republic! Due the fact that citizens vote and we have elected represenitives! 

sorry dude wrong again its a constitutional republic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, jman9798 said:

sorry dude wrong again its a constitutional republic. 

ARE WE A DEMOCRACY OR A REPUBLIC?

Is the United States a democracy or a republic? Unfortunately, the answer is politically and definitively confusing. Our form of government is both a democracy and a republic. Fortunately, the debate is beginning all over again and it was started by ordinary people who feel that our government is out of control.

Dictionaries contain slightly different definitions of a democracy and a republic. However, most dictionaries agree that a democracy is government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.

A republic has two forms and definitions. A republic can be a form of government with an elected president instead of a monarch, or a form of government with an elected president and elected representatives responsible to the people.

Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language brings a democracy and a republic closer together by defining a republic as "a form of government in which the sovereign power is widely vested in the people either directly or through elected representatives."

Cuba's President Fidel Castro, Iraq's President Saddam Hussein and the presidents of many totalitarian governments fit the first definition of a republic. However, they are tyrannical presidents that wield the sovereign power of monarchs.

The United States fits the second description of a republic, which, combined with the definition of a democracy, makes us a republic of representative democracy or what some call a democratic republic.

In the definitions of both a democracy and the second definition of a republic, however, the supreme power is supposed to be widely vested in the people. But in our democratic republic, the power of the people has been compromised by those who have assumed greater powers.

The word "democracy" is not contained in the Constitution, yet it begins with the democratic statement, "We the people of the United States. do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. The only place the word "republic" is mentioned is in Article IV, Section 4. "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, PrezLegend said:

ARE WE A DEMOCRACY OR A REPUBLIC?

Is the United States a democracy or a republic? Unfortunately, the answer is politically and definitively confusing. Our form of government is both a democracy and a republic. Fortunately, the debate is beginning all over again and it was started by ordinary people who feel that our government is out of control.

Dictionaries contain slightly different definitions of a democracy and a republic. However, most dictionaries agree that a democracy is government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.

A republic has two forms and definitions. A republic can be a form of government with an elected president instead of a monarch, or a form of government with an elected president and elected representatives responsible to the people.

Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language brings a democracy and a republic closer together by defining a republic as "a form of government in which the sovereign power is widely vested in the people either directly or through elected representatives."

Cuba's President Fidel Castro, Iraq's President Saddam Hussein and the presidents of many totalitarian governments fit the first definition of a republic. However, they are tyrannical presidents that wield the sovereign power of monarchs.

The United States fits the second description of a republic, which, combined with the definition of a democracy, makes us a republic of representative democracy or what some call a democratic republic.

In the definitions of both a democracy and the second definition of a republic, however, the supreme power is supposed to be widely vested in the people. But in our democratic republic, the power of the people has been compromised by those who have assumed greater powers.

The word "democracy" is not contained in the Constitution, yet it begins with the democratic statement, "We the people of the United States. do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. The only place the word "republic" is mentioned is in Article IV, Section 4. "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government."

Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and must govern according to existing constitutionallaw that limits the government's power over citizens. A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any governor elected will have the full support and loyalty of my crew. Just let us be brutal on those criminals and cop killers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Philosophy said:

Any governor elected will have the full support and loyalty of my crew. Just let us be brutal on those criminals and cop killers.

I just PM'd you...let's talk!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, jman9798 said:

Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and must govern according to existing constitutionallaw that limits the government's power over citizens. A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States

We are constitutional, we are democratic, and we are a republic! Making us a Democratic Republic that FOLLOWS a CONSTITUTION!

COUNTRY
DESCRIPTION
Afghanistan Islamic republic
Albania parliamentary democracy
Algeria republic
American Samoa NA
Andorra parliamentary democracy (since March 1993) that retains as its chiefs of state a coprincipality; the two princes are the president of France and bishop of Seu d'Urgell, Spain, who are represented in Andorra by the coprinces' representatives
Angola republic; multiparty presidential regime
Anguilla NA
Antarctica Antarctic Treaty Summary - the Antarctic region is governed by a system known as the Antarctic Treaty System; the system includes: 1. the Antarctic Treaty, signed on 1 December 1959 and entered into force on 23 June 1961, which establishes the legal framework for the management of Antarctica, 2. Recommendations and Measures adopted at meetings of Antarctic Treaty countries, 3. The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals (1972), 4. The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (1980), and 5. The Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (1991); the 33rd Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting was held in Punta del Este, Uruguay in May 2010; at these periodic meetings, decisions are made by consensus (not by vote) of all consultative member nations; by April 2010, there were 48 treaty member nations: 28 consultative and 20 non-consultative; consultative (decision-making) members include the seven nations that claim portions of Antarctica as national territory (some claims overlap) and 21 non-claimant nations; the US and Russia have reserved the right to make claims; the US does not recognize the claims of others; Antarctica is administered through meetings of the consultative member nations; decisions from these meetings are carried out by these member nations (with respect to their own nationals and operations) in accordance with their own national laws; the years in parentheses indicate when a consultative member-nation acceded to the Treaty and when it was accepted as a consultative member, while no date indicates the country was an original 1959 treaty signatory; claimant nations are - Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, NZ, Norway, and the UK; nonclaimant consultative nations are - Belgium, Brazil (1975/1983), Bulgaria (1978/1998), China (1983/1985), Ecuador (1987/1990), Finland (1984/1989), Germany (1979/1981), India (1983/1983), Italy (1981/1987), Japan, South Korea (1986/1989), Netherlands (1967/1990), Peru (1981/1989), Poland (196
Article 1 - area to be used for peaceful purposes only; military activity, such as weapons testing, is prohibited, but military personnel and equipment may be used for scientific research or any other peaceful purpose; Article 2 - freedom of scientific investigation and cooperation shall continue; Article 3 - free exchange of information and personnel, cooperation with the UN and other international agencies; Article 4 - does not recognize, dispute, or establish territorial claims and no new claims shall be asserted while the treaty is in force; Article 5 - prohibits nuclear explosions or disposal of radioactive wastes; Article 6 - includes under the treaty all land and ice shelves south of 60 degrees 00 minutes south and reserves high seas rights; Article 7 - treaty-state observers have free access, including aerial observation, to any area and may inspect all stations, installations, and equipment; advance notice of all expeditions and of the introduction of military personnel must be given; Article 8 - allows for jurisdiction over observers and scientists by their own states; Article 9 - frequent consultative meetings take place among member nations; Article 10 - treaty states will discourage activities by any country in Antarctica that are contrary to the treaty; Article 11 - disputes to be settled peacefully by the parties concerned or, ultimately, by the ICJ; Articles 12, 13, 14 - deal with upholding, interpreting, and amending the treaty among involved nations; other agreements - some 200 recommendations adopted at treaty consultative meetings and ratified by governments; a mineral resources agreement was signed in 1988 but remains unratified; the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty was signed 4 October 1991 and entered into force 14 January 1998; this agreement provides for the protection of the Antarctic environment through six specific annexes: 1) environmental impact assessment, 2) conservation of Antarctic fauna and flora, 3) waste disposal and waste management, 4) prevention of marine pollution, 5) area protection and management and 6) liability arising from environmental emergencies; it prohibits all activities relating to mineral resources except scientific research; a permanent Antarctic Treaty Secretariat was established in 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentina
Antigua and Barbuda constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system of government and a Commonwealth realm
Argentina republic
Armenia republic
Aruba parliamentary democracy
Australia federal parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Austria federal republic
Azerbaijan republic
Bahrain constitutional monarchy
Bangladesh parliamentary democracy
Barbados parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Belarus republic in name, although in fact a dictatorship
Belgium federal parliamentary democracy under a constitutional monarchy
Belize parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Benin republic
Bermuda parliamentary; self-governing territory
Bhutan constitutional monarchy
Bolivia republic
Bosnia and Herzegovina emerging federal democratic republic
Botswana parliamentary republic
Brazil federal republic
British Virgin Islands NA
Brunei constitutional sultanate (locally known as Malay Islamic Monarchy)
Bulgaria parliamentary democracy
Burkina Faso parliamentary republic
Burma parliamentary government took power in March 2011
Burundi republic
Cambodia multiparty democracy under a constitutional monarchy
Cameroon republic; multiparty presidential regime
Canada a parliamentary democracy, a federation, and a constitutional monarchy
Cape Verde republic
Cayman Islands parliamentary democracy
Central African Republic republic
Chad republic
Chile republic
China Communist state
Christmas Island NA
Cocos (Keeling) Islands NA
Colombia republic; executive branch dominates government structure
Comoros republic
Congo, Republic of the republic
Cook Islands self-governing parliamentary democracy
Costa Rica democratic republic
Cote d'Ivoire republic; multiparty presidential regime established 1960
Croatia parliamentary democracy
Cuba Communist state
Cyprus republic
Czech Republic parliamentary democracy
Democratic Republic of the Congo republic
Denmark constitutional monarchy
Djibouti republic
Dominica parliamentary democracy
Dominican Republic democratic republic
East Timor republic
Ecuador republic
Egypt republic
El Salvador republic
Equatorial Guinea republic
Eritrea transitional government
Estonia parliamentary republic
Ethiopia federal republic
Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) NA
Faroe Islands NA
Federated States of Micronesia constitutional government in free association with the US; the Compact of Free Association entered into force on 3 November 1986 and the Amended Compact entered into force in May 2004
Fiji republic
Finland republic
France republic
French Polynesia parliamentary representative democratic French overseas collectivity
Gabon republic; multiparty presidential regime
Georgia republic
Germany federal republic
Ghana constitutional democracy
Gibraltar NA
Greece parliamentary republic
Greenland parliamentary democracy within a constitutional monarchy
Grenada parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Guam NA
Guatemala constitutional democratic republic
Guernsey parliamentary democracy
Guinea republic
Guinea-Bissau republic
Guyana republic
Haiti republic
Holy See (Vatican City) ecclesiastical
Honduras democratic constitutional republic
Hong Kong limited democracy
Hungary parliamentary democracy
Iceland constitutional republic
India federal republic
Indonesia republic
Iran theocratic republic
Iraq parliamentary democracy
Ireland republic, parliamentary democracy
Isle of Man parliamentary democracy
Israel parliamentary democracy
Italy republic
Jamaica constitutional parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Japan a parliamentary government with a constitutional monarchy
Jersey parliamentary democracy
Jordan constitutional monarchy
Kazakhstan republic; authoritarian presidential rule, with little power outside the executive branch
Kenya republic
Kiribati republic
Kosovo republic
Kuwait constitutional emirate
Kyrgyzstan republic
Laos Communist state
Latvia parliamentary democracy
Lebanon republic
Lesotho parliamentary constitutional monarchy
Liberia republic
Libya operates under a transitional government
Liechtenstein hereditary constitutional monarchy
Lithuania parliamentary democracy
Luxembourg constitutional monarchy
Macau limited democracy
Madagascar republic
Malawi multiparty democracy
Malaysia constitutional monarchy
Maldives republic
Mali republic
Malta republic
Marshall Islands constitutional government in free association with the US; the Compact of Free Association entered into force on 21 October 1986 and the Amended Compact entered into force in May 2004
Mauritania military junta
Mauritius parliamentary democracy
Mayotte NA
Mexico federal republic
Moldova republic
Monaco constitutional monarchy
Mongolia parliamentary
Montenegro republic
Montserrat NA
Morocco constitutional monarchy
Mozambique republic
Namibia republic
Nauru republic
Nepal federal democratic republic
Netherlands constitutional monarchy
Netherlands Antilles parliamentary
New Caledonia parliamentary representative democracy
New Zealand parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Nicaragua republic
Niger republic
Nigeria federal republic
Niue self-governing parliamentary democracy
Norfolk Island NA
North Korea Communist state one-man dictatorship
Northern Mariana Islands commonwealth; self-governing with locally elected governor, lieutenant governor, and legislature
Norway constitutional monarchy
Oman monarchy
Pakistan federal republic
Palau constitutional government in free association with the US; the Compact of Free Association entered into force on 1 October 1994
Panama constitutional democracy
Papua New Guinea constitutional parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Paraguay constitutional republic
Peru constitutional republic
Philippines republic
Pitcairn Islands NA
Poland republic
Portugal republic; parliamentary democracy
Puerto Rico commonwealth
Qatar emirate
Republic of Macedonia parliamentary democracy
Romania republic
Russia federation
Rwanda republic; presidential, multiparty system
Saint Kitts and Nevis parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Saint Lucia parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Saint Pierre and Miquelon parliamentary representative democracy
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Samoa parliamentary democracy
San Marino republic
Sao Tome and Principe republic
Saudi Arabia monarchy
Senegal republic
Serbia republic
Serbia and Montenegro republic
Seychelles republic
Sierra Leone constitutional democracy
Singapore parliamentary republic
Slovakia parliamentary democracy
Slovenia parliamentary republic
Solomon Islands parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Somalia in the process of building a federated parliamentary republic
South Africa republic
South Korea republic
South Sudan republic
Spain parliamentary monarchy
Sri Lanka republic
Sudan Federal republic ruled by the National Congress Party the (NCP), which came to power by military coup in 1989; the CPA-mandated Government of National Unity, which since 2005 provided a percentage of leadership posts to the south Sudan-based Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), was disbanded following the secession of South Sudan.
Suriname constitutional democracy
Svalbard NA
Swaziland monarchy
Sweden constitutional monarchy
Switzerland formally a confederation but similar in structure to a federal republic
Syria republic under an authoritarian regime
Taiwan multiparty democracy
Tajikistan republic
Tanzania republic
Thailand constitutional monarchy
The Bahamas constitutional parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
The Gambia republic
Togo republic under transition to multiparty democratic rule
Tokelau NA
Tonga constitutional monarchy
Trinidad and Tobago parliamentary democracy
Tunisia republic
Turkey republican parliamentary democracy
Turkmenistan defines itself as a secular democracy and a presidential republic; in actuality displays authoritarian presidential rule, with power concentrated within the presidential administration
Turks and Caicos Islands NA
Tuvalu parliamentary democracy and a Commonwealth realm
Uganda republic
Ukraine republic
United Arab Emirates federation with specified powers delegated to the UAE federal government and other powers reserved to member emirates
United Kingdom constitutional monarchy and Commonwealth realm
United States Constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic tradition
Uruguay constitutional republic
Uzbekistan republic; authoritarian presidential rule, with little power outside the executive branch
Vanuatu parliamentary republic
Venezuela federal republic
Vietnam Communist state
Virgin Islands NA
Wallis and Futuna parliamentary representive democratic French overseas collectivity
Western Sahara legal status of territory and issue of sovereignty unresolved; territory contested by Morocco and Polisario Front (Popular Front for the Liberation of the Saguia el Hamra and Rio de Oro), which in February 1976 formally proclaimed a government-in-exile, the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), near Tindouf, Algeria, led by President Mohamed ABDELAZIZ
Yemen republic
Zambia republic
Zimbabwe parliamentary democracy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now