Posted September 13, 2018 (edited) Shady Inc // ABOUT US // Shady Inc is a prestigious law firm with its clients best interests in mind. It was founded in 1998 by Jepp, and has been consistently growing since then. We take great pride in protecting all our clients against harassment from police, and protecting the freedom to do business as the business owners see fit. // HIRING // Shady Inc is currently hiring new lawyers. If you would like to apply for a position, please message @jeppevinkel. We would be happy to hear from you, and discuss the details of the position. If you'd like any more information about the company or our partners, please check our website http://shadyinc.jeppdev.com/. // COMPANY EMPLOYEES // President: @jeppevinkel CEO: N/A COO: N/A CFO: N/A Board of Directors: N/A Lawyers: Dag Ross // JOB DESCRIPTIONS // President: The president handles all operations in the company. He is the final chain in all decisions made by the company. Chief Executive Officer: The CEO handles all business operations. He/she handles all business opportunities, decisions, and choices. Chief Operations Officer: Handles most operations. Supervises choices, decisions, and takes over for CEO when he/she is away. Chief Financial Officer: Handles all financial decisions, he/she also manages financial issues, financial choices, etc. Board of Directors: The BoD handles issues with the company. Lawyers: The lawyers are tasked with defending our clients to the best of their extend in any case they've been given. // INVESTORS // Investors will get a percentage of the profit.All investors are listed below, if you'd like to invest in our company please message the president or CFO. Company Name: Company Name: Edited September 13, 2018 by jeppevinkel Added lawyer 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 13, 2018 Best of luck to your firm! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 14, 2018 Probably should get rid of the default text on your website Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 14, 2018 I'll do eventually. It's just placeholder. I just gotta get it ready before the release of TS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 14, 2018 19 hours ago, Cstove said: Best of luck to your firm! Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 14, 2018 If subject (A) is arrested without being read his or her rights, and officer (A) arrests subject (A) on murder charges, What do you do in essence of a defense? What would be the outcome? -Allen Camel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 16, 2018 (edited) On 15/9/2018 at 12:48 AM, ChillBilly said: If subject (A) is arrested without being read his or her rights, and officer (A) arrests subject (A) on murder charges, What do you do in essence of a defense? What would be the outcome? -Allen Camel The only thing changed by an officer not reading out the rights, is that nothing you say can be used as evidence against you in trial. However it can be spun to show the officers lack of training and misconduct, which can be used in the defendants favor, since it will lessen the confidence in the cops work. The exact outcome on such a situation is hard to determine from the given info, as there are lots of factors, but the act of not reading the rights alone won't dismiss the validity of a case. The only affect it has by law is that the cop can't use statements from the subject as evidence, and can't use any evidence obtained through the information gotten by the subject. I hope this answered the question. Best regards Jepp Shady Inc Edited September 16, 2018 by jeppevinkel 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 18, 2018 On 16/09/2018 at 3:37 PM, jeppevinkel said: The only thing changed by an officer not reading out the rights, is that nothing you say can be used as evidence against you in trial. However it can be spun to show the officers lack of training and misconduct, which can be used in the defendants favor, since it will lessen the confidence in the cops work. The exact outcome on such a situation is hard to determine from the given info, as there are lots of factors, but the act of not reading the rights alone won't dismiss the validity of a case. The only affect it has by law is that the cop can't use statements from the subject as evidence, and can't use any evidence obtained through the information gotten by the subject. I hope this answered the question. Best regards Jepp Shady Inc This shows you have a basic understanding of how the law works. I am involved with law in real life, and if you knew how many people online think that failure to mirandize your suspect automatically results in the entire case being thrown out, you'd laugh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 18, 2018 18 minutes ago, JoelKeys said: This shows you have a basic understanding of how the law works. I am involved with law in real life, and if you knew how many people online think that failure to mirandize your suspect automatically results in the entire case being thrown out, you'd laugh. Lol. Sure would make it easy if that was the case, but I wouldn't try to answer law related questions without at least a bit of research first. Not even in a game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
