@MauriceClinton He criticizes you because he thinks your wrong (Which, in the case of abiding the law and ethics, you are). I'm sorry, but nobody will take you seriously with those "policies". Also, how do you translate your German to English? Do you use anything, or did you take classes? I think I could help you translate better.

@yellowhero12 Good idea, not many companies in this department!

Ehm... A rusty car? I'm pretty sure that a rusty car will only be able to fit 4 people, have a very slow top speed, and bad gas mileage. I think you should just work at a basic job for a while, until you have 500+ dollars. Then you could rent a bus from someone. You would be able to fit 50 people into one tour! Just a suggestion.

@MauriceClinton I have to be honest with you. Creating laws that give certain companies a break are scummy, let alone outright funding businesses. If you want to make a serious run for governer, you should rethink your policies, not say you are going to donate to businesses, and make a new forum account.

That doesn't seem like someone who wants to form a peaceful coalition would say

Yep. The devs will have to work hard to find the balance between too much and too little.

Could non-law enforcement get their hands on this gear? Like could a gang take out some S.W.A.T members and take their gear? Or maybe it could be purchased on a black market?

In my opinion, having punishments for getting caught in a crime is a good thing. It adds more thrill knowing there could be a real punishment, and it requires gangs to plan out their missions more. If we didn't restrict criminal activity, gangs would be running everywhere killing people, blowing up cars, robbing, etc. And then it would make it impossible for the non - criminals to enjoy the game. Remember, Identity is also supposed to be realistic, so jail time just makes sense. Maybe not 1+ hour, but maybe a 30 min prison sentence would be good.

Thanks for the info! If businesses can own office buildings, what would be in them? Cubicles? Meeting rooms? What use would it be for a company?

Roblox hentai. Italian food or Chinese food?

Lol

How would you enforce $2000 dollar operations? If hospitals were owned by players, they would quickly go out of business or have to offer terrible medical care. Healthcare is expensive for the hospitals, you know. Again, this would contribute to bankruptcy. Since you can't make the $2000 an operation happen, Hospitals would collect about $18,000 in health insurance before giving their customer a free operation that costs them $100,000. What laws? How would you enforce these laws? You really love laws. If you support a free market, why are you placing so many laws on privatized healthcare? And even more, destroying the health insurance industry is pretty anti-free market.

If healthcare is separated from the state, hospitals will become businesses. This means that medical bills could go up, since now the hospitals aren't only looking for coverage on Doctor's salaries, physicians, diagnosis, drugs, medical equipment, electricity, water, food, etc. Now they have to turn a (bigger) profit. But then you double down on people by restricting health insurance. It is not a waste of money to pay a company to help you out when you have a $150,000 dollar medical bill. Even if it doesn't happen, it was that person's decision to pay for it. Don't you support a free market? 1. If hospitals became privatized, what would you do to prevent a monopoly on health care? 2. How are people supposed to pay their bills when hospital costs go up, and they can't get health insurance? 3. How would you keep the economy healthy when a huge industry that makes a lot of money, and therefore pays a lot of taxes to the government, is wiped out? 4. What is to prevent doctors from tricking their patients into paying more? 5. How would doctors be able to make "more affordable" plans?

I think everyone has agreed on a similar stance, should we move on to the discussion of Healthcare now?

The tax plans will have to change depending on what the government has to pay for. I think it's hard to predict every single thing they will. For example, Lucious Times tax plan might not provide enough money, or maybe just right. It all depends on the final model of the game. For now, I think the flat 10% tax rate is a fine plan to settle on.

This might be a dumb question, but doctors will be paid through their own work? As in they wont be paid by the government? So you are looking to make hospitals player owned? Also, taxing the higher earners more could provide universal healthcare, which I'm sure is a good thing for everyone. I can go more in depth but I don't have time right now.

I like the idea of taxes being fair across the board, but I just don't think the 10% rate on all incomes is enough to sustain the government's costs. There has to be some more income from taxes, to pay for programs like welfare, food stamps, and universal healthcare. Not to mention roads and salaries for doctors, policemen, etc. Shouldn't there be at least a 20% rate for the highest earners? If you still stick to your 10% plan, how do you plan to have enough funds to keep the programs running, infrastructure great, and salaries high with less funds? Candidate Thomas Hetch's tax plan seems much more reasonable (Although the 50% tax is a bit too high).

I think we might need to see where you stand on more positions than just Healthcare.

I really like your idea! I think being elected Mayor should be something that the citizens would really have to consider. It would be boring to just decide how much to spend, and how much to illegally use by sliding a bar, and basically condensing being Mayor into one mind-numbing job. Being Mayor should be a bit more tougher than that, for the people who actually want to do a good job without it being served to them, and so people need to think more about who to elect. There also should be consequences, like cracked roads and low wages (For government services) when a bad mayor elected. In essence, I agree with you. Good luck with the campaign!

Is there anymore jobs available?

Other applicants aren't critiquing each other because it isn't their job. Again, it isn't your job to point out things that are wrong in your opinion. I don't know when I ever lied. I really don't have time for this, so don't expect me to answer back to your assured reply.

I am glad to see you realize how un-professional you are being. If you want to get technical with plagiarism and somehow reading people's minds from behind your computer screen, then let me tell you that other applicants don't critique other applicants. You had no business criticizing my application. Now, can you please stop?

You don't know what the employer wanted, this isn't a real application, it's not your job to review people, it isn't pointless, as typing it back would show that you read it. Stop trying to call other people out to sound professional. I never asked your opinion, thank you.

I never attributed my paragraph as my own, I was simply telling back what I read. If someone asked you about the history of Supreme™, would you tell them what I said or what you said? Again, it is not your job to critique my review. As far as I know you aren't in the company.

Well you did neither. I typed out my whole paragraph, so it doesn't matter if it is similar to the Wikipedia page. It shows that I have read the history of Supreme™, and not made 3 sentences about how cool it is and that I should be in it. I don't know why you had to critique my review.