I get what you are saying, but there was no reason that they had to record that video in that specific part of the map. The fact that they obviously wanted to make a great and exciting video worries me because they obviously would have chose an area which is good to film it in, and this is what we got. Basically all I am saying is that if this is the best they had to offer, I am worried. They would not have said to themselves, "Let's record this highly anticipated video in a area that we haven't worked on in a while." I also said that it doesn't change my opinion on Identity as a whole, my post is purely on the C&P video, not Identity as a whole. The video was sloppy and bad. They could have done better, they chose not to. Taking a few hours out of a day to make a quick video does not seriously affect the project as a whole.

I get what you are saying, but as I said in my own post, the use of placeholders is not a valid excuse for a gameplay video. Teasers are supposed to show placeholders, to tease us of what the game is like, but we were promised a gameplay video, we got a video and when we complain about, the defense seems to be that everything was a placeholder. What did we see then? How much of an accurate representation is that video of the game? If we didn't see the real animations or graphics, what did we see? What is the point of showing us gameplay if everything we saw is going to be changed? If the development team has to choose between releasing a bad video or meeting a deadline, then they should stop setting themselves deadlines. Stop promising us things if you can't deliver on them. I will also say though, we aren't attacking the dev team maliciously. I backed the game and want it to do well, but I simply disliked the gameplay video. We are allowed to tell the development team that they made a bad video and we didn't like it, that is okay. We do not need to defend them, because they aren't being attacked. We are giving them our feedback.

I think he means ideally which one would you like to see. I know military won't be in the game but it would be very cool to get invaded

What is it you are interested in?

Prosecution and Defense are sorted already, only respond if you want to be a jury member Nevermind, we still need a prosecutor.

FAQ's Who Are We? Keys is a company which specialises in unique high-end attire and on the rare occasion every day items such as pens, wallets and furniture. Our target market is aimed at men only, however that doesnt prevent us working with women. We specialise in formal wear however we arent limited to that. What Makes You Different? We spend a large amount of time working on each design we produce and there isnt a single button on any of our products that isnt there to serve a purpose. We also work closely with our more wealthy clients to produce unique one of a kind products that satisfy every single persons desires. How Do I Apply? Reply to this thread using the template provided. Hierarchy Administration CEO - @JoelKeys Chief of Marketing - @Cookie Chief of Design - @RemingtonVanderbilit Chief of Finance - @ErjonBerisha Chief of Research and Development - @ThomasKillah & @MarvinForman1 Design Department Designer - (Max. 4) *Researcher - (Max. 2/Department) Marketting Department Marketing Representative - (Max. 4) **Model - (Max. 3) *Researcher - (Max. 2/Department) Other Secretary - (Max. 2) *Researchers are assigned to a department but ultimately work under the Chief of Research and Development **Models work for free/almost free to start out but it is a good entry level job to the company Should you require any information on any jobs, comment below and ill explain it. All employees are entitled to a complementary suit from Keys. Thanks for reading, remember to ask questions.

Thanks to a suggestion made by @Villasenor, I will be using a new business structure for my company. Anyone who already has a position in the company will need to reapply as I am not sure who is still active etc. The new structure is as follows: CORPORATE CEO (1) - Joel Keys Operations Chief (1) - Villasenor Chief Financial Officer (1) - Andrew811 Human Resources Director (1) - OPEN Hiring Director (1) - OPEN Design & Manufacturing Design & Manufacturing Manager (1) - OPEN Senior Designer (3) - CLOSED Clothing Designer (5) - OPEN Accessories Designer (5) - CLOSED Tailor/Modiste (5) - OPEN Public Relations PR Manager (1) - OPEN Marketing Agent (4) - OPEN Market Researcher (2) - OPEN Public Associates (-) - CLOSED To apply or for more information, private message me with the job you are interested in and a CV if necessary.

You can remove The People's Party from future polls as there are no active candidates running for office under said party.

Okay so instead of arguing my points you regurgitate the same old nonsense from before. Good day to you, you clearly cannot understand simple logic

You are banning me from coming to the debate which is my debate. I challenged her to it, she made a thread because my one got deleted. It was my debate, so lets clear that up first. Secondly, you are banning me. You basically said "You can come but you can't speak", which is essentially banning me from participating. You compare this to a house party but use the wrong metaphor. This is like me making a house party, my invitations get lost so LaVie sends out a batch of her own. I challenged LaVie to a debate, and she accepted. Now you have come along and said I cannot speak in it, even though LaVie was fine with it before. You are trying to latch onto this as some kind of debate organiser, when you are not. LaVie private messaged me and was asking me when I am available to come and debate her, YOU came and said I cannot join in since I am not a political leader. As for you being immature, you called me a baby for being annoyed at the fact I can't come to my own debate. Since I challenged LaVie and since she accepted I would be willing to say it was as much her debate as mine. Since I am now out of the equation (thanks to yourself), I think it is 100% her debate. That makes it 0% yours, so perhaps you should allow LaVie to dictate who can come as there is clearly a conflict in your two opinions.

Im not acting like a baby. I think it's perfectly reasonable for me to be annoyed that the debate (which by the way was my idea, I challenged PourLaVie to this debate in another thread before it was deleted) is not allowing me to join. I literally started this, and you are banning me from coming. Obviously I won't just give in and accept this. Please show me where I was being immature, disrespectful or insulting. Every comment I have made is justified with facts. You are the immature one for turning to ad hominem.

So she calls for a debate based off the fact that I made an attack of her campaign and I am not even allowed to participate? After reconsidering, I won't be coming.

Well I mean I am not a leader of a political party, I am a citizen. So I can't come either?

I would love to.

I would never call someone a creep, a troll or mentally incapable without reason. I am informing you that due to you violating the forum rules I will be disengaging in any conversation with you. Good luck on your campaign, Mrs LaVie.

You think that is offensive? You have, in the last 24 hours, called me mentally incapable, said I have no life, a creep, childish, and a troll. I will continue to use the very common phrases 'sweetheart' and 'darling'.

I appreciate the kind words, friend.

Oh don't flatter yourself. Hetero or homo, I certainly have no desire to have sexual relations with you.

Presented without comment. Other than that comment, I like the idea of the news channel but all of the other ones I do not think would work very well.

I am not twisting anything. You explicitly stated that it is fine for one group of people to do one thing but another group cannot. That is discrimination. Also known as heterophobia.

How would me being gay change a statements meaning? So a gay person can say it but I can't? So you are being discriminatory? Harassment is serious allegations, sweetheart, and unless you have actually been harrassed I would encourage you to calm yourself down. And yes, Lucious was winning with or without me, and yes I see that as an opportunity. What's wrong with that? That is called politics, and I am completely open about this to @LuciousTimes. I am siding with him because it benefits me, that's how politics works. You should take a course in politics.

I am not working for Lucious, I am working WITH him to help him win. So are all of his voters. You are the pathetic one, you cannot argue civilly so you resort to name calling. Quite sad, sweetheart.

Darling I am no failure. I am working with Lucious now, who is much bigger than you. You can resort to name calling all you want, it just shows your level of pettiness and inability to defend yourself reasonably.

This, ladies and gentlemen. This is what you are voting for if you vote FrancePoorLaVie. A delusional dreamer with no means to deliver on her false manipulative promises. She resorts to ad hominem whenever she is losing a debate, clearly not stable in the brains department. I understand politics fully, unlike this political reprobate.

My school formal is on the 22nd, told them I am not going to play this. Really hope there is no more delays.