Join us...

One should vote the P.R.P. if one values Feminism while exterminating the patriarchal system that governs the world.

It is extremely unfortunate that one of the party's most noble allies had lost the opportunity to continue with the electoral race against the Right-wing capitalist and fascist political parties of Identity Island. It shall be my pleasure to announce that Damien Malik of The People's Revolutionary Party shall continue to support the working-class citizens of Identity Island against the threat of capitalism and fascism.

Governors shall be elected based on the popular vote within the island. However, one is merely producing "regional representatives" in order to ensure that the P.R.P. fulfills the needs and desires of each and every region within Identity Island considering that each city and/or region consists of citizens with different occupations, roles, wealth etc...

According to the developers, the three cities within identity Island shall be classified as "Ash Hill", "Roseport", and "Turtle Beach". However, I am currently questioning the name of the regions of Identity Island. I.E. Does the rural regions consist of names? ----------------- On a side note, "The People's Revolutionary Party" is currently recruiting subjects that are willing to function as REPRESENTATIVES within either Ash Hill, Roseport, or Turtle Beach. Representatives shall be responsible for representing the interests of the party within the region.

Bumping organization for the purposes of hiring more individuals into the organization.

Did one manage to examine the policies of "The People's Revolutionary Party" prior to forming such a conclusion?

The following topic shall display the "SYMBOL" of each active political party within Identity Island. Thus, it is highly recommended that one states the NAME of their political party, alongside with the SYMBOL of their political party. Name: The People's Revolutionary Party Symbol:

Mao Tse Tung transitioned a backwards agrarian nation-state into a nation-state with an increased population growth, industrial production, and life expectancy rate. In the process, Mao Tse Tung converted one of the most agrarian nation-states into a dominant super-power in less than a decade. In fact, the famines that had predated Mao Tse Tung's rule consisted of a higher death rate than the nation-state under Mao Tse Tung, himself. As for the post regarding Josef Stalin, the statistics are fabricated. How many human beings has capitalism executed within the past several years?:

I will legitimately share a two-bedroom apartment with you if you are willing to produce propaganda images for the party, comrade.

One should examine the party's dialectical understanding of the "economic cycles" of taxation in order to comprehend the idea that a "100% revolutionary tax" shall not be permanent. The 100% revolutionary tax is applied as a means towards ensuring that income-inequality does not run rampant to the extent that it causes a major division of the classes.

May one please produce and publish a propaganda poster that involves representing the "Anti-Right Movement' (A.R.M.) or "Anti-Right Coalition" (A.R.C.) against Capitalism and Fascism, comrade?

May one please e-mail any coalition/movement-based propaganda to my e-mail account as soon as possible, comrade?

One's company shall not be manipulated by the state. However, companies that serve the interests of working-class citizens shall be heavily funded in order to ensure that the demand of the public is served.

Imagine a situation that consists of fourteen year-old millionaires determining the will of your business as consumers, as-well. The situation would not be any different under a capitalist system. However, within a capitalist system, the citizens with the highest purchasing power shall determine the outcome of a business rather than the majority of the citizens within the island. You: Argues that "Supply and Demand" is a necessity within any system. Also you: Dislike the idea that "Supply and Demand" may ruin his business when it is in the hands of the majority, rather than a few wealthy investors that would already regulate the market with inhumane capitalist practices.

It would be based on the will of the People considering that the People shall decide which commodity or service serves their interests.

The plan involves ensuring that each and every single human being shall attain universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, education, and transportation. How would a business be deceased when a demand for a commodity shall result in purchasing mass-produced versions of their commodities or services?

The game mechanics remain well-aligned with the taxation system of the game considering that high taxation policies would result in the state possessing the purchasing power to invest in businesses that strictly meet the demands of the people. Thus, on an abstract and figurative term, the state would own the means of production. One economic cycle consists of a "100% taxation system", which causes the state to own 100% of the resources for the purposes of distributing such goods according to the needs of the people. Within the party's topic, the original post mentions that the "Revolutionary Stage" shall result in abolishing the "Income Tax" in exchange for a "Revolutionary Tax".

(My mistake, I had accidentally transitioned the discussion to a real-life-based scenario considering that I am legitimately a true Marxist and activist within the real world) Businesses would be owned by the state. The citizens would state their needs to the party. Afterwards, the party would boost production of the specific commodity or service until such needs are met. Individuals will be paid differently within the game. However, an income-tax shall ensure that wealth and resources are equally distributed according to the needs of the people. One should examine the P.R.P.'s economic tax program, which consists of three cycles, within it's main post/topic.

"In the situation you provided, a communist society would force its' business owners to artificially lower their prices, and force workers into public projects to create more housing. Do you see where this can lead to further poverty and the destruction of small business in an already shitty situation?" Businesses would not exist within a Communist system. My person should not bother engaging in a conversation with a human being that is not even aware of the definition of Communism. "Businesses will lower prices in Communism"... Seriously unaware of the definition. I cannot believe that I had wasted my time arguing with a human being that had produced such a claim. One also cites the D.P.R.K. as a Communist state when it is a Pseudo-Monarchy. Even worst, one classifies Seattle as a Socialist city... it's a capitalist city with a few SOCIAL (not socialist) policies. The conversation shall be discontinued until one is capable of even grasping the BASICS of economics. One cannot discuss the deeper content until the opposing party is aware of the basics. I shall merely provide you with one counter-argument regarding the claim of "competition". Within Cuba, subjects are willing to study and practice medicine for the purposes of producing remedies and hospitalizing patients, despite earning a lower wage than a waiter or waitress, considering that their PASSION to fulfill such a role within society overpowers the materialistic incentive towards fulfilling the role within the system. But, in all honesty, I cannot waste my time arguing with a human being that classifies Seattle and the D.P.R.K. as a Communist, or even a Socialist, state. Basic economics must be discussed before one even attempts to indulge in the deeper content.

"Communism crumbles due to being unsustainable"... Communism has never existed. The majority of PROCLAIMED Socialist states collapsed due to U.S. interference. "When the state cannot produce a certain good or service which the people need, the people will look within to see if another can provide that good/service, leading to the recycled reliance of capitalism." ... The state would be governed by the People. Thus, the people shall be capable of providing themselves with their demands. "This is an assumption that is not backed up in any study discussed thus far. I was speaking specifically of the wealth distribution within a capitalist country, which in this case was the U.S."... It would be unjust to merely reference to one Capitalist nation-state when that one nation-state exploits the entire planet Earth for it's profits, resulting in providing it's citizens with the privilege to function as business owners through the exploitation of labour and resources overseas. "Tyranny of the majority"... Constitutional guidelines such as providing subjects with the "Right to Life, Liberty, and Personal Property", alongside with anti-discrimination Laws, shall not result in tyranny. "Supply and Demand"... More suitable within a Communist society considering that the demands of the public are only produced if it is profitable within a capitalist society. Food and shelter is a major demand within the capitalist international community. Yet, homelessness and malnutrition is a major issue amongst capitalist developing nations throughout the globe. P.S. Developing nations are more capitalist than The United States of America considering that labour Laws, minimum wage Laws, environmental Laws etc... do not exist within these nation-states, which is the reason as to why U.S. multi-national corporations form their headquarters within these developing nations. "It is incredibly dangerous for a government state to artificially produce un-needed positions just to occupy their citizens, by the aforementioned problem of "overmanning"." Automated labour resolves the issues regarding the need for producing commodities that fulfill the desires of society. However, skilled labour is a necessity for humanity, even during peaks of over-production, considering that subjects could apply their skills and experience in order to invent and discover new ideas for humanity. An over-supply of doctors? Not at problem, such doctors could utilize their time conducting research in order to cure illnesses rather than treating patients for minor issues. An over-supply of teachers? Teachers shall conduct research rather than teaching students. Any manual-labour-based job would be replaced by automated labour, resulting in issues such as "underproduction of industrial and agricultural-based commodities" to be non-existent. One's attempting to argue that capitalism is sustainable when food is dumped in the garbage bin due to overproduction within nations that lack the purchasing power to provide their citizens with food... it's extremely sustainable with utilizing fossil fuels as a means towards producing profits rather than resorting to renewable-based energy sources (sarcasm). The food and energy crisis would not exist within a Communist system due to the current development of advanced technology. Capitalism is extremely sustainable for preventing Indian farmers from attaining access to sanitary water within the rivers of India considering that Nestle had monopolized the water industry. (sarcasm)

Arguing that subjects shall lack an incentive towards labouring within the workplace is based on a false analysis of the Socialist system. One had attempted to argue that "most Communist societies force their citizens to labour specific roles within society". Yet, Communist states have NEVER existed within society considering that such states were often degenerated worker states under state-capitalism. Aside from such inaccurate claims, a Socialist state does not "force" citizens to labour within the system. In reality, through Universal Education, each and every single citizen shall be capable of specializing in a certain role that one desires, rather than being forced to externalize one's labour in order to merely survive (referencing to Marx's "Theory of Alienation"). In the process, the majority of manual labour would be replaced with automated machinery, resulting in subjects possessing more time to produce fulfill their internalized desires through the assistance of Universal education. One had attempted to compare states such as the U.S.S.R. with Socialism. Within the U.S.S.R., the "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie" would APPOINT managers within the workplace, which resulted in managers misrepresenting the labourers within the workplace. However, a Socialist state would consist of a worker's democracy, which involves labourers electing individuals into managerial positions. Thus, managers would be a representation of it's workers while ensuring that productivity remains maximized based on the interests of it's workers. The link that you had posted is a nation-wide analysis of wealth distribution. However, less than 10% of the citizens within the planet Earth possess more than 60% of the world's wealth, indicating that wealth is INHERITED on a global scale. What would prevent a Socialist state from replacing the role of a mere C.E.O. that simply "manifests an idea that appeals to the public"? Public surveys could easily resolve such issues within the public sector, specifically when the public sector is CONTROLLED by the PEOPLE/WORKERS. How I perceive the issue with the bourgeoisie v. proletariat issue: CEO: I have an idea... manifest this idea for me. Worker: Alright, I shall produce 100% of your idea and distribute such an idea to the public. CEO: Brilliant, you only deserve less than 1% of the profits. Worker: Alright, I shall produce 100% of your idea for 1% of the profits. I shall be provided with the identical wage despite my productivity. Producing 100 of your ideas during the first hour and 2000 of your ideas during the second hour shall result in attaining the identical wage. CEO: Deal. Labour power remains exploited through an hourly wage.

The post should be applicable within the general discussion in order to attain the attention of the intermediate apolitical citizens that rarely wander within the podium. The "General Discussion" forums is intended for any open discussion. Thus, the subject is permitted to produce a topic that is based on the political aspect of the game, as-well. P.S. May one PLEASE produce an anti-Fascist and anti-Right propaganda piece for "The Anti-Right Movement" or "The Anti-Right Coalition" in order to prepare for our coalition's/movement's active mobilization against these political parties? A.R.C. or A.R.M (abbreviations)