Jump to content
Capitalist
-
Content count
95 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Capitalist
-
Okay I´m moving on because you don't care about answering my question, you first claim that arguing is using reason but then you avoid answering how calling me an insane redneck has anything to do with reason which you claim to possess in your non-arguments, instead you go back to defensive state, so bye.
-
Oh so now you try to Clinton me. Okay let's pretend you were not emotionally reactive at all then, in what ways does throwing a tantrum at me and my movement calling us a bunch of insane rednecks has anything to do with objective thought and reason? If you can't answer without making an argument I'm moving on. I mean you might aswell call us racist or white trash or whatever, calling us insane rednecks and thinking you have dissaproved anarchism makes you look dumb, tantrums are not an argument.
- 163 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- right wing
- alt-right
- (and 4 more)
-
Oh I see so if I make a bunch of subjective slander non-arguments and defensive assumptions that "millions of people" would agree upon then it'll automatically become objective arguments. No it´s not an argument. I appreciate the discussion while it lasted but when you start throwing snarky tantrums like " insane redneck", or assumptions that I have never stepped a foot into the economics world, then you're not making an argument anymore. I don't think you're quite aware how defensive and stupid you look when you make these non-arguments to intelligent people that genuinely want to understand what we're all about., and I don't mean only you but also all the other people who post emotionally reactive non-sense here. If you have an argument I'm open to discuss but if you're gonna spew non-arguments then stop wasting our time, we don't need your empty emotional reactiveness here because they're not arguments.
- 163 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- right wing
- alt-right
- (and 4 more)
-
Not an argument
-
1.Oh here we go again here comes the, WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS!!!11!?!!1 argument again. Like I haven't answered that a hundred times before. The same people that build the roads today through peoples tax money, the private sector, it's just that in our society it will be built on voluntary money. Look if you wanna build a country based on volutarism where people will pay taxes in a voluntary manner, fine go ahead, but if you use force to build a country in a armed society you're on your own, you will have the whole armed people against you and your 100 statist friends. It will end pretty badly. Yes corporations who suck the welfare tit of the government will be subjected to the freemarket once there is no government, fuck corporations who use state power to gain profits, they are the reason so many dumb leftists hate Capitalism when this has nothing to do with capitalism at all, this is corporatism and corporatism is anti-freedom, so you´re really really wrong here my friend. I´m way more capitalistic than you're. There will be competing currencies in the Anarcho-Capitalist society, if you keep printing the same currency it will lose value, so competing currencies will balance that out. I would personally create currency based on gold, now that´s something that will never run out of value. 2. Guns keep people safe, not people with the monopoly on guns. cops will be probably come late anyways if shit is about to hit the fan, i'll probably be dead by their arrival. A armed society is a polite one. Stay armed friends. 3. So you´re saying we can't have anarchism because governments will use force to conquer any "FREE LAND" Aka Armed Anarchist Land .. You know this is not an argument right?
- 163 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- right wing
- alt-right
- (and 4 more)
-
Yeah mandatory loan that they never pay back called taxes. We are the only ones who tell statists to piss off from from our wallets and our personal lives. But they keep coming back don't they? Another reason we need to abolish the government.
-
Sure, I would not recommend it but if you gonna start a business that will make nice profits and you low on money then sure.
-
Non-sense. In a anarcho-capitalist society everything will be privatized so a person will find plenty of jobs that will pay more than 12 dollars, you´d probaby earn more by getting money from the church or charity for the poorer classes than working for a Company A. look I understand what you mean but this is not possible in a scenario without taxes, without taxes you´ll earn so much money that even shitty jobs will pay decent and with plenty of competing companies striving for profits without regulations there will be cheaper alternatives of food, houses and tools for less income people. This is very simple.
- 163 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- right wing
- alt-right
- (and 4 more)
-
Everything the government does, the freemarket can do it better. So moving everything that is state owned to private owners will lead to better quality of goods and services since they compete for profits. Read on Lassez Faire economics.
- 163 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- right wing
- alt-right
- (and 4 more)
-
This movement is not a party, I guess you could call it a philosophy as you say with the ultimate goal of abolishing the government. I have argued your points many times before. Everything that the the government does will be moved to the markets, that´s how simple it is. All the people working for the government will be moved to the markets. Any other arguments or questions?
-
Not an argument.
-
False, government is not based on mutual consent as it requires taxes to fund it self, taxes is force and a violation to the non-aggression-principle. If I have 10 bandits invading my property and I don't have the proper tools to take them out by myself, I´ll hire a private security/private army/private police.. you name it, to deal that for me for the right price. Personally I would build big golden walls around my property and I´ll have a pool filled with prostitutes with M16s and AK74s, who would stop me? Not you or your 10 goons that's for sure.
-
1. Yes I am. Yes it is possible to become an anarchist, technically. I'm the proof of that muhahaha. 2. False, government is a monopoly on force. If monopoly on force is abolished, there can't be any government. Read on the Non-Aggression Principle. 3. In an armed anarchist society there is no institution to conquer or land to invade. Only properties, for properties to become goverments they need to use force against other properties which won't last for long in a armed society. If you walk on my property to claim it as your own under a rule of government you'll get shot dead. Try to enforce government anywhere in an armed anarchist society and you'll brake the non-aggression-principle and get shot. Organized societies don't require force, so Anarchism is included, governments on other hand do.
-
Is not an argument, Also I have answered that statement before. How will "I" fund the whole community have been argued too, but I guess you´re to lazy to read the whole topic. I´ll let these videos answer your question..Hint: Private Sector. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVYnQyZWlik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgMCw1yjPgA
-
If one of these men or somebody like them would one day knock on your door, would you rather be armed or unarmed?
-
No thanks. Don't turn Identity into a tax farm. Champange socialists are worse to deal with than communists. Atleast communists want to make everyone equally poor.
-
All I get from you is, "I'm okay with government robbing 30% or 60% of my hard earned money every month if they give me shit that will be worth my 30/60% of my monthly labor".. You don't sound like a businessman to me. If you're rich business man, you'd know that government is not your friend. They will steal your money for shit that they either can't deliver or won't be worth the tax money, if you're poor and lazy then fine. Let the market do the job, fuck the political parties, you said yourself that they're a turn off.
-
No. DayZ is post-apocalyptic zombie shithole and not an anarcho-capitalist society based on individual freedom, freemarket and the non aggression principle.
-
No. Not even close. By the way this is Identity not GTA V.
-
#notanargument
-
Uhhh, how is this movement "liberalistic-socialistic" in any shape or form? I'd like to see an argument of that because thats not true, We'll first create a functioning capitalist freetown/suburbia before we abolish the government, that is if we a have a freedom loving capitalistic government and we'll just bribe them or convince them through discussion or protest to become even more free "legalizing all drugs and guns etc". Those are the peaceful ways to change the government to our interest. Other than that if we can get enough anarcho-capitalists inside the government,, then we'll crush the government system from the inside and abolish the welfare state without the permission of anyone but ourselves. Goodbye regulations! I'm open to other ideas and methods of crushing the government by my fellow anarchist brothers. These are just my personal thoughts and plans of doing this.
-
Not an argument.
-
I appreciate that. Welcome to the movement!
- 163 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- right wing
- alt-right
- (and 4 more)
-
NSDAP was statism on steroids, regulations and government power was on totalitarian levels. Don't Clinton me bro..
-
Not an argument.
- 163 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- right wing
- alt-right
- (and 4 more)